Tag Archives: Minolta

Long-live Rollei!

I know it’s been a while since I’ve posted anything (again…). The exhibition plans are on hold indefinitely. At least till the time I can gather a good quality film portfolio. Digital photos just seemed to disconnected and no longer have that appeal in my head. Plus, I’m practicing darkroom printing these days and I want to exhibit all hand printed photographs.

Anyway, a friend gave me a roll of Rollei Retro 400s to try out. Having not tried any of the non-mainstream films (Portra, HP5, TMAX, Tri-x, etc.) I didn’t want to risk blowing it on something that I put a bit of effort in. Loaded it in my tiny Oly MJU II and took a few snapshots.

I have to say, I am really impressed by this film. It’s exactly what I need. The rich blacks, fine grain and high contrast make it absolutely brilliant. Sadly, as far as I can tell, it’s not that easy to come by (at least in Melbourne). And the places that do stock it, charge insane prices. I’m probably just going to stick with Tri-x and/or TMAX for now.

The photos below are untouched scans from my Canon 5600F (except for some cropping and TIFF to JPEG conversion). Developed in Rodinal for about 10 minutes at the usual 20 degrees and fixed in Ilford Hypam.

Enjoy!

Image

Image

ImageImageImageImageImage


Finally…

Disclaimer: These are just my personal views/experience(s). 

Everyone knows, Leicas are, quite possibly, the best cameras money can buy. And, naturally, I have been lusting after one ever since I started photography a few years back. Originally, I was crazy for the M9. But this was when I didn’t know much about photography and just thought the flagship was the best (yes, that is the case but that is mainly true for DSLRs – not for rangefinder cameras IMO).

I used to be extremely intimidated by film photography before I actually tried it out for myself (I still am though, but it’s not as foreign a concept as it used to be). Now I’ve realised that if one truly wants to experience a Leica, they must get one of their gorgeous mechanical film cameras. Mainly the legendary Leica MP (that too in black…yummmmy) that’s rated as one of the best mechanical film cameras of all time. Well, I can’t afford a MP as yet, but I managed to get a well used (and maybe even abused) but fully functional 1935 Leica III for a very decent price off of eBay by accident. “By accident” I mean, I placed quite a low bid around (just for fun) 3 days before the bidding was supposed to end, thinking it would never sell for what I set my maximum bid at, and totally forgot about it since I was busy playing around with my new toy, the Minolta. I get the ‘item is ending soon’ email on my Blackberry, which I discard, and the next thing I know, I’ve won the item! I seriously couldn’t believe it. I was the owner of a Leica. I didn’t care which one it was (as long as it wasn’t a stupid point and shoot – the X1 is actually pretty good though).

My Minolta Uniomat with my Leica III

I knew the Leicas of that era aren’t rated as one of the most easy to use cameras but I seriously couldn’t care less. We have become so spoilt because of technology that we have forgotten what it takes to make a good photograph. There’s no excitement when you transfer the images into Lightroom (or whatever) simply because you already know how that image turned out because you peeked at it on the LCD of your digital camera when you took it.

When I got my first roll developed, the excitement was nerve-racking. I couldn’t contain myself when I was about to receive the prints. Even though, majority of the images I took on that roll were crap, it was a feeling that I will never forget. I don’t remember ever having a feeling that was even remotely similar to this when I started shooting digital.

All this emotional attachment nonsense aside, I have a feeling that one does not have the right to call themselves a photographer till the time they know how to shoot film (this goes for all the wedding and “artsy” photographers out there – glamour and commercial are obviously different scenarios). I feel this is the only way that one can ever learn to respect the underrated art. These days, because of the advent of the cheap DSLR (and the pseudo trendy-ness of the Holga and Lomography – film, but still a fad), any kid who takes a few decent pictures or just knows what every button or dial does (but doesn’t completely understand the function/logic behind it), starts calling themselves a photographer. They fail to understand that being a photographer isn’t about taking a half decent image and then going medieval on it in Photoshop. I know…I’ve been there myself, not so long ago (this paragraph is more of a personal reflection than an accusation).

Anyway, this may seem like complete horse shit to some or it may actually make some sense. Either way, here’s a shot of my dream that came true.


35mm

If you have been reading my blog recently, you’ll know that I spotted a mint condition Minolta on eBay after searching for almost 2 weeks for a cheap semi-automated rangefinder. It was listed for $65 plus $10 for postage. I asked the few usual questions from the seller regarding light leaks, lens fungus or dirt, rangefinder, shutter and light meter accuracy, and was told that “it seems to be working fine but since this camera hasn’t been film tested, I cannot say for sure. However, I can offer you a 2 week trial period in which you can test the camera out as much as you want and if there are any issues – full refund.” Sold.

Since the camera was located in Melbourne, I asked the seller if I could pick it up instead. He agreed and the very next morning I was at his place doing a final inspection. It wasn’t cleaned and had a bit of mould on the leather and around the areas one would normally grip it and the focus ring was extremely stiff (I had to hold it like a bottle top to make it move!). Using these non-issues, I thought I would haggle a bit and see where it gets me. I started at $30. He said $60. I said $35. He said $50. I said $40. He said “done”. Just like that, it was mine.

Giddy with excitement, I left his home and went straight to a camera store and bought a Kodak 400CN (I usually set my ISO at 400 when street shooting with my D90 so figured that would be a good starting point for me) black and white film ($13 – same film on eBay: $3-$5). Loaded it and hoped on the train to the CBD (see what I was on about in the previous post about me not being patient). I kept fiddling with the focus ring and slowly it did become a tad bit loose but not loose enough to be used for fast paced street shooting (the lubricant in the focus ring was all sticky due to lack of use). Also, I was a bit uncertain about the selenium light meter and it’s accuracy. Then again, this was supposed to be a test run for the camera to see if everything worked the way it’s supposed to.

On the train, I really started to inspect it and see what controls I had at my disposal. There were two switches on the lens marked ‘X’ and ‘M’. And another marked ‘V’, which I soon figured out, was for the self-timer. The ‘X’ and the ‘M’ switch…no idea whatsoever! There is a flash guide table on the back of the camera that sort of explained what I had to do with that switch. Don’t know what I derived from that table but I switched it from ‘X’ to ‘M’ and left it there. Then there was the issue of the aperture ring (as this is an Aperture Priority camera, there are no dials available for shutter speed adjustments). There is a ring that controlled the exposure (I know that because it moved a needle in the light meter), but it doesn’t have any aperture values. Instead, it has a ‘B’ (‘Bulb’ mode obviously) and then numbers from 6 to 18 in normal succession. I figured these were the EV values instead of f-stops (my hunch was right since I finally found some info on the camera which confirmed it). With this unconfirmed understanding of the camera, I got out the train and immediately started shooting.

Focusing was a pain because of the stiff focus ring and, tiny as it may be, there is quite a bit of viewfinder blockage because of the 45mm prime lens. I know all RF cameras have this problem, but this was the first time I was shooting with it so it felt distracting. Along with that, I kept forgetting to check the light meter that is situated on the top of camera instead of the ‘in-viewfinder’ info I’m used to. It is quite a heavy camera for it’s size and it’s built like a tank – solid metal. Not a single bit made out of plastic. So without a wrist strap, it was proving to be a challenge to handle. The ergonomics are decent – it was the weight without a proper grip that was the issue.

As you can probably tell, it wasn’t exactly a good experience. All that uncertainty and the newness of film didn’t leave me in a comfortable situation. I know it was a test run, but I still wanted some assurance that I’ll get at least one half decent photograph! And to top it all off, I kept looking at the back of the camera to look at the result (bad habits die hard)! After taking a few shots, I just put it back in my bag and went to the State Library and sulked for a bit. Disappointed at myself for buying something without doing much research into the subject the camera addressed – film photography.

After spending 15 – 20 minutes in the same corner, I saw a guy in the library with an old Olympus OM film SLR dangling around his neck. I followed him with the intention of catching up to him and having a chat about film photography thinking maybe he could give me an idea about what I was doing wrong (he seemed to carry it with confidence which led me to believe that he may be experienced in the film area). But before I could catch up to him, he went straight into the ‘Arts’ section which was a silent area. I followed him and instantly saw a whole sea of book shelves on photography immediately towards my right. Weirdly enough, I had never been to this part of the library before (all I’ve ever done in the library before this was study for my exams). I looked through the countless amazing books on everything from glamour, to fine art, to commercial, to portrait, to this, to that photography. It felt like heaven! Thankfully, I realised I was drooling before it overflowed.

As much as I wanted to read all the books in those shelves, I grabbed the two that attracted me the most. A biography on Ansel Adams and another one that was published by Magnum Photos. Even though that Magnum Photos book was more related to the style I wanted to peruse, I couldn’t pass reading on the absolute genius that was the great Ansel Adams. I read and I read. Before I knew it, I had spent nearly 5 hours in the library. A small pile of books had formed on my table, all related to film photography.

After reading all those books, I realised I was looking at film photography all wrong. I was still in my overshooting digital mindset i.e. not emotionally involved in the process of capturing the photographs; not feeling the composition; there was no soul in my photographs. Film photography is an art form and black and white gives it character.

I left all my frustration with those amazing books in the library and headed back out. I kept telling myself to be patient. Wait for the shot to come to you. But it never did and I went back home without taking a single shot.

The next day my wife and I had to go watch a cricket match with a few friends and instead of taking my (comparatively) big D90, I thought I would take the Minolta with me. I didn’t have any intention of taking any pictures of the cricket match so I figured just the Minolta would do me fine.

Still getting used to the field of view. It would have looked a lot better if I was closer.

I had all the things I had read about in the books and on the blogs circling in my mind and was determined not to get impatient and ruin my chances of getting a good shot this time. Surprisingly, my wife didn’t mind this time when I kept pausing and waiting whenever I saw an interesting composition while we were walking from the train station to the stadium (she usually snatches the camera away from me when I do this with my D90). I was having trouble framing since the frame lines in the viewfinder aren’t that bright and I hadn’t, as yet, gotten used to the field of view I get with the 45mm f2.8 Rokkor. Even with all this waiting, I couldn’t get a decent shot (in my head at least). It came down to the point that my wife and I found a bench in front of a multilevel walkway just outside the stadium that made up a nice composition. And then we waited. She played games on her iPhone and I preset my focus and exposure. We waited around 10 minutes when I finally got what I wanted and I quickly took the shot. As soon as I pressed the shutter release, I felt strangely satisfied and I knew this was the one. With a smile on my face, I looked at the exposure counter. That was the last one.

I was so excited to see that picture that I went to the closest 1 hour photo lab at around 9 am and dropped off the film for developing and rushed off to do my other chores for the day as quickly as possible. 9:42 and I was free. The last 18 minutes were torturous (partly because the excitement was killing me and partly because I spent those 18 minutes looking at the clock on the dashboard of my car). I couldn’t take it any longer. It was exactly 10 am and I still hadn’t received the call letting me know that I could pick up the prints. I walked into the photo lab and they tell me they’re just printing them and it’ll take another minute or so. I can swear I heard the ticking of seconds in my head.

The minute passed and I finally had the prints from my first roll of film in my hands. I paid them and rushed back into the car and ripped open the bag. Crap…crap…crap…crap…not bad…meh…*17 prints later*…..

(just a big ass smile)


Take 2

It has been very long since I’ve posted anything (minus my last post – after almost 7 months!), to say the least. I really don’t know why that happened even when I had so much going on, photography wise. But before that, I was completely neglecting photography. I literally had to blow dust off my poor D90.

Soon after writing the 7 month old post, I just sort of stopped using my camera. I hardly had time to get out and shoot. And when I did have the time, I would watch television or play Call Of Duty instead of using my camera. It didn’t matter to me at first. I sort of gave up on photography. But, out of nowhere, I became extremely frustrated with myself for letting my passion die.

The first thing I tried doing was to change my style a bit. Event photography and all that commercial nonsense that I wanted to get into just stopped appealing to me. Fine art and street photography gained my interest and I tried to get more technical with my camera instead of Photoshop or Lightroom (that said, I did make a few serious attempts at HDR photography – not in the usual overdone, unrealistic fashion but more with the idea of what the human eye would see). I also started to try and frame the photograph as well as I could within the camera instead of cropping it later. I realised how little I paid attention to the overall composition of the photograph and forcing myself to stop cropping has really started to help me create much better composed photographs than I did before (in my opinion). Although with the D90, always getting the right composition isn’t always possible since it doesn’t have a 100% viewfinder and I’m still getting used to the viewfinder crop (these little changes in my shooting style have made me start from scratch, which is a good thing).

A picture from my first real attempt at street photography

So, with my new angle towards photography, I started paying more attention to the photograph I was about to take. Along with really thinking about my composition, I tried to evaluate the exposure (even with the correct metering, there’s, more often than not, some fault) as accurately as possible so that the picture was ready to be shown with very little or no post adjustments at all. All this thinking and planning also stopped me from over shooting, which I used to do a lot (I’m sure both my camera and computer thank me for that).

Like I said before, I’ve also gained quite a bit of interest in street photography. The thought of capturing that “decisive moment”, that one moment in daily life that will never occur again, was just too good to pass up without a serious attempt. So, after reading up on the basics concepts and ideas of street photography from various blogs like www.erickimphotography.com  and www.85mm.ch (by the way, if you’re into street photography even a little bit or just want to see what the fuss is all about, be sure to check out both these sites. Both, Thomas Leuthard (85mm) and Eric Kim are geniuses behind the camera and also very generous guys who share their knowledge for free and through workshops. Plus Thomas Leuthard has got excellent ebooks for free download on his site – get them by clicking here), I grabbed my D90, slapped on a 28mm f/2.8D prime on it and went into the streets of Melbourne‘s CBD without any real idea of what I was going to shoot. I did that deliberately just so that I could get a feel of what I was up against. And to be honest, the streets intimidated me like anything before. But I started shooting anyway. I was shooting random people. With hardly any thought given to composition or anything else other than the exposure. Needless to say, all the 150ish photographs were absolutely crap.

Patience is not a trait found in my personality. And it was because of this that I decided to hit the streets after reading only a few blog posts. Little did I know that street shooting was far less complicated that I had imagined it to be. As far as the camera settings are concerned, just set it in Aperture priority, set a mid range-ish aperture, set the ISO depending on the light (or leave that in ‘Auto’ as well) and you’re set. I had my camera on manual the first time and spent almost the first 45 minutes trying to figure out the right settings since the light is almost always different in different places. I was too worried about the exposure setting than anything else. In street shooting, composition is key. Let the camera worry about everything else.

Coming back to the matter of patience, you need bucket loads of it in street shooting. I’ve realised that now – somedays you may get 5 or 6 amazing shots, other days, you may not get even one. One needs to be patient and wait for it to come to you. You will never get the composition you want when you hunt for it.

The other thing that I’ve derived from my, now, massive library of ebooks and documentaries on street shooting is that almost everyone says something or the other that is loosely or directly related to the quote by legendary photojournalist, Robert Capa, “If your photos aren’t good enough, then you’re not close enough.” While that may be true around 80% of the time, one doesn’t always need to get in their subjects’ face. I will admit, getting as close as Robert Capa requires some major cojones and does yield some spectacular results, I just simply can’t get that close (for now). Now, look at the guy who practically invented street shooting, Henri Cartier – Bresson (nothing even remotely related to street shooting is complete without the mention of his name). He did get close but when he talks about street shooting, he talks about geometry. And that’s the style I want to develop. I know it’s not very original of me, but at least I have a direction till the time I try out different things and determine my personal style.

To force myself to be patient and not over-shoot, I got a smaller memory card for the D90 (I normally have a 16gb card but I opted for a 2gb card for this exercise). I did stop but I still took a few useless images that I simply deleted when I ran out of memory. To completely cure myself of the impatience, I shelved my D90 again and recently bought a 52 year old Minolta Uniomat 35 rangefinder camera. Mainly because I’ve wanted to try a rangefinder system for a very long time and also because you can’t review/delete your pictures when shooting film. You have make every shot count. I haven’t done much street shooting with the Minolta as yet but the number of times that I have been out with it, I’ve only had the roll that was already inside it and, to make things even more challenging, never carried any extra film.

This all said, I have been using my D90 for other stuff that’s beginning to interest me; star trails and time-lapse photography. I’ve done two attempts at this till now (mainly because we haven’t had a clear night sky for over a month here in Melbourne. Clouds just have to show up at the wrong time!).

My first attempt at star trail photography.

Anyway, this has been a concise version of what I have been up to lately. I concentrating more on film photography, so my next post is going to be focused on my first few attempts at film photography (rangefinder and film, both are firsts for me).

Stay tuned!


A little treat for myself

Hellllooooo!

I know, I know! It’s been a long time since my last rant. So much has changed! For starters; I finally got off my ass, grabbed my camera and took some photographs (but more on that in the next post, which will be posted soon – hard to believe huh?). This (weirdly enough) isn’t a rant. I finally bought something that I’ve wanted for a very long time.

After craving for a 35mm film rangefinder, I finally got my hands on one today. A Minolta Uniomat for $40 off of eBay!

Mechanically it’s almost perfect and aesthetically it isn’t too bad either. No dents or major scratches. Focus ring’s very stiff at the moment but nothing a basic service (or hair dryer) won’t fix. My main concern was the selenium light meter. Don’t know why but I’m not too confident about the readings it’s giving me but it appears to be working.
I guess the transition from DSLR to complete battery-less analog will require some getting used to in the trust-thy-camera department.

The viewfinder has some dirt in it but the lens is clean as a whistle and the aperture blades are also in good condition. The rangefinder mechanism is working fine as far as I can tell. The images line up perfectly most of the time but I had a bit of a suspicion once or twice (or I should start wearing my glasses more often?).

I got it mainly for my recently developed interest in proper street photography. That, and I love manual focusing on a RF system (it’s just so easy and you feel so connected in the whole photograph-making process rather than hearing the beep and then taking a picture that had absolutely no thought put into it).

My first film camera. Quite a bit of learning and getting used to (addicted) to be done. I don’t think I’m confident enough to do any serious photography with it till the time I get the results of the first processed roll back though.

All in all, not disappointed with my purchase in the slightest bit. I don’t really care about the slight faults as long as they can be fixed. Hopefully it’ll be as good as new with a bit of TLC.

Of course this is just a generic, temporary satisfaction for my craving. The MP (film RF royalty) is the main goal. But this’ll do very well for now.

Can’t wait to hit the streets with my new love! 😀

20111231-031132.jpg